The Wikileaks founder appears at the Old Bailey in a dark suit and maroon tie, his first public appearance since the first part of the hearing in February.
Supporters of Julian Assange have protested outside a London courtroom, calling for the WikiLeaks founder not to be extradited to the United States for leaking secrets about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Many brandished placards could be seen reading "don't extradite Assange" and "journalism is not a crime!" as the 49-year-old Australian was brought to the Old Bailey for the resumed hearing on Monday.
Fashion punk queen Vivienne Westwood joined protesters and said the former hacker was "shining the light on all the corruption in the world".
Earlier, Assange's partner, Stella Moris, delivered an 80,000-strong petition opposing his extradition to Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Downing Street office.
In an interview published in The Times newspaper on Saturday, Moris, 37, said: "For Julian, extradition will be a death sentence."
She said she feared he would take his own life, and their two young sons, who were conceived during his asylum in Ecuador's London embassy, would grow up without a father.
Assange appeared in the dock wearing a dark suit and maroon tie, the first time he has been seen in public since the first part of the hearing in February.
He spoke to confirm his name and date of birth, and said he did consent to extradition.
The Old Bailey hearing – due to last three to four weeks – had been set to go ahead in April but was delayed by the coronavirus outbreak.
Assange faces 18 charges under the US Espionage Act for the 2010 release of 500,000 secret files detailing aspects of US military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Washington claims he helped intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to steal the documents before recklessly exposing confidential sources around the world.
If convicted, he could be jailed for up to 175 years.
Any ruling in favour of extradition is "almost certain" to be appealed by the losing side, according to John Rees, of the Don't Extradite Assange Campaign.
Assange, who has become a figurehead for press freedom and investigative journalism, had a "very strong defence", Rees added.
But he was concerned the case had become "highly politicised".
A previous hearing was told that US President Donald Trump promised a pardon if Assange denied Russia leaked emails from the campaign of his 2016 election opponent Hillary Clinton.
READ MORE: Julian Assange now faces the battle for his life
At the February hearing, Assange's lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, said his client would not get a fair trial in the United States and would be a suicide risk.
James Lewis, representing the US government, said WikiLeaks was responsible for "one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the US".
"Reporting or journalism is not an excuse for criminal activities or a licence to break ordinary criminal laws," he added.
Assange appeared weak and confused during his February court appearance, apparently forgetting his date of birth.
He also told district judge Vanessa Baraitser he had not understood what had happened in the hearing.
His legal team has repeatedly warned about his health, including from the spread of Covid-19, and an independent UN rights expert said in November that his continued detention at a high-security prison was putting his life at risk.
Meanwhile, the Council of Europe rights group warned that Assange's extradition would have a "chilling effect" on press freedom.
READ MORE: US charges WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange with espionage
The saga began in 2010 when Assange faced allegations of sexual assault and rape in Sweden, which he denied.
He was in Britain at the time but dodged an attempt to extradite him to Sweden by claiming political asylum in Ecuador's embassy in London.
For seven years, he lived in a small apartment in the embassy, but after a change of government in Quito, Ecuador lost patience with its guest and turned him over to British police in April 2019.
Swedish prosecutors confirmed last year they had dropped the rape investigation, saying that despite a "credible" account from the alleged victim there was insufficient evidence to proceed.